Former President Trump will not be allowed to make his own closing argument in his New York civil fraud trial after his lawyers refused to comply with reasonable guidelines set by Judge Arthur Engoron. The judge had initially granted permission for Trump to address the court, but rescinded it after sources reported that Trump intended to deliver his own speech in addition to his legal team’s summations. This decision comes as a blow to Trump’s defense strategy and highlights the heightened tensions surrounding the high-profile trial.

Judge Reverses Decision to Allow Trump’s Closing Argument

Judge Arthur Engoron has reversed his decision to permit former President Trump to make his own closing arguments in his New York fraud trial. The judge denied Trump’s unusual request, citing his failure to agree to “reasonable” guidelines set by the court. According to sources, the judge rescinded permission after learning that Trump planned to deliver his own speech alongside his legal team’s presentations. This development adds a new layer of complexity to the trial and could potentially impact its outcome.

• Former President Trump denied the opportunity to deliver his own closing argument in his New York civil fraud trial
• Judge Arthur Engoron reverses decision after Trump’s legal team refuses to comply with reasonable guidelines
• Trump planned to deliver his own speech in addition to his lawyers’ summations
• This decision highlights the heightened tensions surrounding the high-profile trial

“They should pay me” – Donald Trump

New York Attorney General Letitia James is seeking a $370 million fine against Donald Trump and his companies as part of the civil fraud trial. She is also calling for a lifetime ban on Trump from the state’s real estate industry. However, Attorney Alina Habba has criticized James’ proposed fine and ban, labeling it as excessive. This trial has garnered significant attention due to its potential implications for Trump’s business empire and the questions surrounding potential financial wrongdoing.

N.Y. AG Seeks $370 Million Fine and Lifetime Ban

New York Attorney General Letitia James is pushing for a $370 million penalty against Donald Trump and his companies as part of the ongoing civil fraud trial. Additionally, James is calling for a lifetime ban on Trump from the state’s real estate industry. This aggressive stance by the attorney general has sparked criticism from Attorney Alina Habba, who argues that the proposed fine and ban are disproportionate to the allegations against Trump. The trial’s outcome and the potential financial implications for Trump’s business empire hang in the balance as the legal battle intensifies.

• New York Attorney General Letitia James seeks a $370 million fine against Donald Trump
• The proposed fine is part of the ongoing civil fraud trial
• James is also calling for a lifetime ban on Trump from the state’s real estate industry
• Attorney Alina Habba criticizes James’ proposed fine and ban, considering them excessive

“Sick and sad” – Alleged comments on Letitia James’ efforts to “up the ante” against Trump in civil fraud trial

In a significant development, Judge Arthur Engoron has barred former President Trump from presenting his own closing arguments in the fraud trial. This decision comes after Trump’s legal team refused to comply with reasonable guidelines set by the court. The denial of Trump’s request further intensifies the already high-stakes proceedings and adds another layer of complexity to the trial.

• Judge Arthur Engoron bars Trump from delivering his own closing arguments
• Trump’s legal team’s refusal to comply with guidelines prompts the decision
• This development adds complexity and tension to the trial