Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stands out among her eight Supreme Court colleagues for one key reason: She’s had to weigh in on more legal questions regarding the January 6th riot than any other member of the Supreme Court. On Thursday, during a tense exchange in the Supreme Court hearing, Donald Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell clashed with Justice Jackson over the characterization of the events. Mitchell referred to the events as “shameful, criminal, violent,” arguing that it was a “riot.”
Legal Case Involving Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Donald Trump’s Attorney
During a Supreme Court hearing, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson found herself at odds with Donald Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, over the nature of the January 6th riot. Mitchell argued that the events were a “riot,” emphasizing the shamefulness, criminality, and violence associated with the day. Meanwhile, Justice Jackson challenged Mitchell’s claim that the events were “not an insurrection,” putting her in the spotlight for her deep involvement in legal questions surrounding the riot.
Might interest you:
Summary of the News:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has been involved in more legal questions regarding the January 6th riot than any other Supreme Court member. Donald Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, engaged in a tense exchange with Justice Jackson during a Supreme Court hearing. Mitchell referred to the events as “shameful, criminal, violent,” asserting that it was a “riot.” Justice Jackson challenged Mitchell’s claim that the events were “not an insurrection.”
Leave a Reply